Quantcast
Channel: Eluxurious
Viewing all 55 articles
Browse latest View live

A Little Vintage Vacuuming

$
0
0
It had been some time since I had used these particular machines, and all were somewhat hungry for a little dust and dirt.

The average age of these lovely old fellows is 63 years, or, if you like, a combined total of 251 years! Not content to rest in dignified retirement, all still perform exactly the job they were intended for, perfectly quietly and efficiently. Amazing, and, for an Electrolux enthusiast, heartwarming.

Naturally, these are strictly for dusting and bare floors. None are equipped for a power nozzle (in fact, the power nozzle, I think, hadn't even been invented by the end of the run of these machines), so carpet duty is out of the question. And yet, before power nozzles, that's exactly what these machines were used for. In these days of homes with non-carpeted surfaces, you wouldn't do TOO badly with one of these as your regular vacuum, provided, of course, that you emptied and kept the cloth bag clean, and that you weren't noticeably allergic.

Clockwise from top: 57, 55 3rd version, 30, 55 1st version.






Getting its Bearings

$
0
0
Presenting Renaissance #2, or Model C104H. I've had this fellow for a while, but he had a terribly bad front bearing, which has been replaced. Now, he's quite his old self again.

Putting the bearings and other things to the test:



The C104H is definitely not up to the C104A in terms of looks, but its true that the solid battleship grey machines have a certain kind of homely charm. See the picture at the end for a fantastic exhibition of battleship grey-ness. I'm not sure why they didn't make the trim on this one darker grey (i.e. the same color as the body of the first Renaissance) to give it a little extra dash.

Come to think of it, it really doesn't look that bad, does it?



I believe the major difference between the two Renaissances is in the hose handle circuit board, as the first was apparently problematic. Other than that, the differences are cosmetic: graphics rather than words on the hose handle, and battleship grey body, power nozzle, Sidekick, wands, and hose ends. It's also possible that the C104H floor brush had the openings in the front row of bristles, but I'm not sure, because this one is 'stolen' from the matching-in-color Epic 6500. Incidentally, the Renaissance C104H had color-matching models in the Epic 6500 (which I have), Epic 3500 (which I have), and Ambassador III.

At all events, the Renaissance C104H is back on regular cleaning duty, and that's great. Naturally, he performs as well as his near contemporaries.

The full-on ensemble shot, after a washing, magic eraser-ing, q-tipping, re-washing, and Armor-All coating. The plastic (?)/lexan (?) bodied models really look quite nice when cleaned and detailed...you can even see the shine.



A Fairly Serious Makeover - Discovery III

$
0
0
In my previous post on the Discovery III, I indicated that the bearings were crapping out, and the handgrip was loose. Well, problems solved. After some time at the local Aerus emporium, the Discovery III has a brand new power handle and after filter, and has received a tune up. Naturally, I'm as happy as a clam (why are clams particularly happy?) that its back to full functionality and on regular cleaning duty.

Having its day in the sun, and showing off its improvements:



As soon as I got it home, it was Discovery III-ing the living room carpet, before you could even say "Aerus by Electrolux". The new handle is the standard Aerus replacement grey, with a rocker rather than slider switch; I prefer the rockers, incidentally. As far as I can tell, this handle was the one used on the Discovery II. One can either use the moulded-on cord hooks, or the bottom cord wrap, as one desires.

Moulded cord hooks:

 
Bottom cord wrap:



It's a pity that I couldn't have kept the original brown handle, but sometimes, originality has to be sacrificed to functionality and usability. The handgrip, as can be seen, is a more beige-y color than the rest of the handle, making the handle a possible candidate for a beige or brown painting.

Handgrip, outside:

 

Handgrip, inside:



Altogether, I'm quite happy with the Discovery III, and I'm sure it's good for many more years of cleaning. As can be seen in the last two pictures, I added a cord clip taken off another upright that I had hanging around. This keeps the cord from hanging down or falling off the upper cord clip. The only other improvement I might make is to replace the brush roll. The current one is as old as the machine (25 or 26 years?), even though its still in fairly good condition.




6500 Reasons to Buy an Electrolux

$
0
0
I really had to laugh when I looked at the stats of this blog yesterday. The page views had jumped by over 2000 in a few days. Not to be negative, but I think I'll hold off on congratulating myself over being a "popular blogger", as all of this is probably fake traffic anyway.

Anyway, back to the only reason I'm blogging...Electrolux and Aerus vacuums! Presented here today is the battleship grey Epic 6500, which I bought a year or so ago from an older lady who was moving into an assisted living home. Vacuums owned by "persons of a certain seniority", if I can put it as nicely as possible, tend to be in excellent condition, at least cosmetically, and this one is no exception. It looked like it had rarely touched or bumped against anything in its life.

Here is a picture of the machine the day I brought it home. You can see a couple of scuffs, but nothing that a cleaning wouldn't take care of.



Here is the Epic 6500 after a full-on cleaning. Shiny!


In looking at these pictures, I realized that I confused the floor brushes on the Epic and the Renaissance. The one that came with the Epic has no openings in the front row of bristles. I assume that this is the correct floor brush, and the openings were added later.

A couple of shots of the grey and white Epic 6500s together. There aren't many differences between these two models. The white power nozzle is a little more rounded off over the motor and headlight housing, and it also has an extra row of bristles. I'm not sure if and/or when the double row of brushes became standard on the power nozzles. In addition, the white floor brush has openings in the front row of bristles, but other than these, I can't see any differences.



I can understand why they eventually renamed this model "Legacy". It is, in many ways, a continuation of the tradition of simple, easy to use, hardworking, automatic, and dependable Electrolux vacuums. In fact, there's only one thing I don't like about this vacuum, and that's the suction valve on the hose handle. It can become loose and stay open after some time, and, even when open, it doesn't really reduce the suction enough for delicate cleaning. Other than that, I think the Epics are great vacuums.


The Two Rennies

$
0
0


Presenting the two Electrolux Renaissance models together. Both were on cleaning duty today, so I thought they deserved a photo shoot.

Granted that not everything in the Renaissance set is original and complete, I'm still quite happy to "have what I have". Both work perfectly well and are used regularly. For each machine, I have an original hose and power nozzle, and one set of original standard attachments (dusting brush, upholstery tool, crevice tool, and floor brush) is shared between the two. The first Renaissance needs a matching Sidekick and wands to be complete, and doesn't have its original plug, but at least the battleship grey Sidekick and wands match the trim, and the cord and plug aren't bright orange, or something like that.

The full Renaissance ensemble:


I really feel that the first Renaissance is one of the most significant models ever made by Electrolux, and, incidentally, that's why it gets so much exposure in this blog. In many ways, it's my favourite Electrolux and/or Aerus model, and if and when I come across any others for sale, I'd be happy to add them to the collection.

Upstanding:


I believe these models were produced between 1994-7, but I'm not sure. At least that's what the Aerus model chart says, but that's not always dependable. I'm also reminded that the Renaissance, along with certain other North American models (I think the Genesis LX or LXE and the Floor Pro shampooer), was sold in Europe under the brand name 'Globaltek'. How and why this happened, I'm not sure, but the machines appear to be identical in every way to the North American versions except for the brand name and voltage.

Hose handles 1 and 2. These work exactly the same, with the obvious differences. The 2nd hose is certainly more user-friendly for those who speak languages other than English.


P.S. I've heard some people nickname the Renaissance 'Renny', which, quite frankly, I don't like, but it does give an opportunity for the terrible joke in the post title.

In looking at the picture below, I wonder why the company kept the dark grey cord winder pedal and handle on the otherwise monotone grey 2nd Renaissance?

Diplomat Restoration Project - History and Background

$
0
0
In 1990, my mother won an Electrolux Diplomat at a church raffle. It came with all the standard accoutrements...PN, braided hose, Sidekick, combo tool, long crevice tool, floor brush, and steel accessory wands. It even had the original box.

Naturally, this became the family vacuum. I was in university at the time, and never paid a great deal of attention to it...it was 'merely' the household go-to vacuum. It was used regularly throughout the 90's and early 00's, until, at some point, my father sucked up some water with it while vacuuming the car. Actually, this didn't seem to have much effect on the motor...it still kept chugging away.

As I pointed out here, I inherited my aunt's Epic 6500 in 2002, and I gave it to my folks to use as their regular vacuum, so the Diplomat went into semi-retirement. The braided hose was giving out by that time anyway, although everything else worked fine.

The next step in its life was in my sister's house. She married in 2007, and the Diplomat went with her, along with a used but good condition vinyl hose I bought for it. She used it until 2011 or early 2012, or something like that, and finally, I, wanting it back, traded her my Ambassador (which is the Diplomat's companion model).

So, the Diplomat came back with me. At that time, it still worked, and all the original attachments were intact. I took the machine apart about a year ago, and found pretty much what you'd expect from a vacuum that sucked up water...rusty motor parts, corroded electrical contacts, etc. As I say, it still ran, albeit a bit tiredly, and, while I was taking it apart, the contacts on the thermal sensor snapped off. 

So, what to do? The Diplomat was the first Electrolux in my family, and, as such, while perhaps not significant in terms of Electrolux history, was and is significant to me. I could:

1. Buy a brand new motor for it, or
2. Rebuild it with bits and bobs from other vacuums

I'm going to try option #2. Why?

It so happens I have a System 90, the body of which, when I got it, was practically bright yellow with age (or, more probably, nicotine). The motor and all the parts are intact and have been cleaned and disinfected by me, so it's all good to go. I can transfer the cord, motor and fans, and wiring to the Diplomat body and have a 'new' vacuum. 

At any rate, I have nothing to lose by trying this. I want my vacuums to be useful and used, not sitting there in pieces, and refurbishing the Diplomat will be 'bringing the past to life'. I'd like to document this process as best I can, mostly for my own edification. It's a pity that I don't have any pictures of the Diplomat from its early days, nor do I have the original box, but everything else will be original.

A picture of the Diplomat on or near the day my sister took it away:



A Clean and Upright Citizen

$
0
0
I'm quite pleased to present my latest acquisition, an Aerus Lux 6000 upright. Electrolux and Aerus only made three upright models like this, namely the Electrolux Lux 4000, this one, and a slightly different Aerus Lux 6000*, so these machines are definitely a unique part of the company's history. I had long wanted at least one of them, and I'm quite happy to have this one. Incidentally, this is the first 'Aerus' upright in my collection.**



On the patio:



What sets the Aerus Lux 6000s and Electrolux Lux 4000 apart from all the other uprights?

1. On-board one-piece stretch/flexible hose and telescopic wand (with variable height adjustment). All the other models had a separate hose and wands, stored in a caddy. The telescopic wand is definitely a bit of a throwback to the 60's and 70's Canadian Electroluxes. Incidentally, this hose and wand ensemble forms part of the suction/intake path when connected on both ends...i.e it must be connected for floor and carpet cleaning, and the wand end must be inserted to run the power nozzle.


2. On-board attachments. The combination dusting/upholstery tool fits onto a post on the bag door, and the baby crevice tool clips on to the handle. By the way, this machine didn't come with these attachments, but I have extras to fill the gap.


3. Direct-connect electric hose (for the Sidekick). Sadly, this didn't come with either of these items, but they'll be purchased in the future for sure. All of the other models had a pigtail cord on the end of the hose that plugged into the bottom of the steering handle, or a hose cord for the earlier ones.

4. "Information panel", located on the power nozzle top cover, to inform the user of a full bag/bag change, jammed power nozzle, and normal operation/all systems go. The green 'information' light comes on when both motors are running, but stays off when only the suction motor is running. I believe the current Guardian and Lux Commercial are the only other models with this panel, but I'm not sure. I note that the brush roll bristles are green, as are those on my Lux 9000. I don't recall seeing green bristles on any other Electrolux or Aerus model. 

UPDATE 12-29-13: I've since swapped the green-bristled brush roll for one with the extra row of bristles, for (supposedly) better 'sweeping action'.


All systems go(ing)...green light.



5. Bag door - made slightly bigger to accommodate the Style R hose end and the wiring for the electric hose as well.

There are other minor changes, such as the 'extruded' motor compartment with accessible screws, and in fact I think this was at the time or at least became a common feature to all the uprights. The bottom cord wrap is slightly larger, and, of course, the handle is noticeably different, mainly to accommodate the stretch hose hook. Incidentally, I like the thicker, heavier cord as used on this model and others, although its a pity it's black...it doesn't fit with the rest of the machine. I believe most of the white and blue Aerus models have black cords.


Come to think of it, I'm not sure if there are supposed to be screw covers on this handle...all the pictures I've seen of these models don't have them, as far as I know. In any case, its not a big deal.


Naturally, as soon as I unboxed the Lux 6000, I assembled everything and fired it right up, for a brief test run. The first thing I noticed was a considerable difference in suction and airflow at the power nozzle, far beyond any of the other uprights I have. The second was that it seemed somewhat more difficult to access the power switch, but this may be a 'learning curve' situation. The third was that the suction motor was ever-so-slightly louder than previous models, but not annoyingly so.

I thought, with the addition of the hose, that the ensemble would be slightly heavier to push in use, and, in fact, this is so, but its not difficult, and will get easier with repeated use.

So far, I'm quite impressed with the Aerus Lux 6000. I have to put it through its paces for a while before I can be definite, but so far, all seems good. I'll definitely be adding more detailed comments to this post as time goes by. One thing is for sure, and that's that the Lux 6000 certainly seems of a much 'higher class' than any of the other uprights, and I wonder why Aerus discontinued this style of machine***.

UPDATE 1: The Aerus Lux 6000 went 'on duty' today, and I used it to do the entire house...carpets, bare floors, baseboards, hard and soft furnishings, and table tops.

1. Bearing in mind that the nearest upright I have to this is the white/grey/red Epic 3500, the suction and airflow seems to me to be about ten times greater. Absolutely amazing, and I believe the models that followed were even more powerful. This consideration alone (admittedly, one of the most important considerations!) ranks the Lux 6000 as the best upright I own. This will most certainly be the 'go-to' upright from now on, and I'll probably add a HEPA filter to it to give it superior filtration.

UPDATE 09-24-13: I added a HEPA filter today, and, in conjunction with the Home Solutions bag and carbon pre-filter, it filters quite well.





2. Even though the handle looks somewhat awkward, it's extremely comfortable to use, and the machine maneuvers perfectly.

3. The stretch hose is definitely going to take some getting used to. It snaps back in use, and the wand is a little bit awkward for above the floor use, especially at close quarters to the machine. Perhaps it would have been a little better if they had added a proper gas pump/pistol grip handle to the hose, if this would even have been possible. You need to hold the handle of this machine when dusting even more so than the models with a 'normal' hose, or it will topple over. However, it's extremely easy to pull the wand from its receptacle for a quick cleanup, and its perfect for baseboards and near-the-floor cleaning. The attachments are easily accessible as well, but its a pity they couldn't have used the latch fittings. I can't count how many times (already!) the combo tool has fallen off in use, especially when using the dusting side. The clip for the crevice tool could have been made a little tighter, as well, for the tool does tend to fall off sometimes (and roll under furniture, as I've discovered!). Further to this, some of those little crevice tools have a ridge on the inside that would prevent slippages. I'll have to get one.

Of course, if you were using the Lux 6000 to do any lengthy, detailed above the floor job, such as detailing sofas, you can always use the electric hose, but for a quick once over, the on board hose works fine.

4. The switch is definitely, as mentioned above, a learning curve. It'll take a while before I can get the knack of reaching down and flicking it without letting go of the handle.

UPDATE 2: After a week or so of Lux 6000-ing the house on a daily basis, I think I'll have to change my tune about uprights with on-board hoses and attachments, as I mentioned in note 9 here. I recall a quote from Ralph Waldo Emerson, to the effect that he wished to say what he wanted today, with the proviso that he might change his mind tomorrow. In other words, one can try new things, and accept them, without being inextricably bound to 'old ways', and I've found the Lux 6000 very good as an 'all-round' vacuum. Since the machine is significantly more powerful, and because its so effortless to pull out the wand and dust off furniture, tables, or baseboards, more cleaning is accomplished in a shorter time, and with less effort than the conventional Electrolux/Aerus uprights. Mind you, I still like my other uprights as much as ever, but the Lux 6000 has moved to the top of the heap.



*The other Lux 6000 is part of the "Aerus by Electrolux" lineup, along with the Guardian C154B and front-filtered Lux 3000 (The UltraLux 2000 also has "by Electrolux", but I don't think it says "Aerus" anywhere). It has the front after filter, with "Aerus by Electrolux" above the filter, "LUX" on the power nozzle, and "Lux 6000" on the side(s) (?) of the bag chamber. It also has, according to a video I saw of it, a different, louder, and possibly more powerful suction motor. I'm not sure which one came first, but I'm guessing that the one I have did. The Aerus website shows the manual for the '2nd version'. One thing I noticed in reading the manual for this version is that Aerus recommends replacing the front after filter after three bag changes, rather than after six bags for the other electrostatic filters.

**The Aerus Lux 6000, along with the Lux 9000, Lux 7000, Lux 5500, and Lux 3000, are pretty well the only models of that time that give a sense of being 'wholly' Aerus. All of these models, unless I'm completely mistaken, share the same graphics (I.e. "Aerus" in white on a dark-ish blue background with the orange oval under the "A", and the handwritten "Lux"), and so one can assume they were released at the same time (I'm not sure when...early-mid 2000's?). Some other models around that time have all the business of "Aerus by Electrolux", or "Lux Thingamajig by Aerus" on them. This one is quite simply "Aerus".

***I suppose the main reason was cost-cutting. Witness the change from the Style R Guardian to the Guardian Ultra. It's possible that users found these models a bit less comfortable to use, as well. This design is now used on other uprights...the "Proteam" and a few others, so I guess Aerus sold the design. They should have kept the 4000/6000 as the top-of-the-line upright, and offered the Discovery style as the middle or bottom model, with perhaps the option to add the longer cord found on the commercial upright (instead of having a seperate commercial model) to either the 4000/6000 style or the Discovery style.



The Distinctive Advantages of Discovering a Clean Living Space

$
0
0
Presenting the Electrolux Discovery Advantage upright vacuum cleaner, made around 1989/90, or thereabouts. This machine came to me in fine cosmetic and running condition, and is unique (in my collection, at least) for having the optional add-on dual Sidekick and power plug port on the handle. In fact, that's the main reason I wanted it.

Close up of the dual port. The handle simply plugs in like all the others, and the hose cord or electric hose pigtail cord for the Sidekick plugs into the left receptacle. It even has a power switch. This port harmonizes perfectly with the shape of the handle and 'bulkhead' (as Electrolux calls it), and adds tremendously to the functionality of the vacuum.


Rear view, with electric hose inserted and plugged in, and Sidekick ready to go. Wires, wires everywhere, but at least it's not as bad as the old days of hose cords (it's not even as bad as the days of electric braided hoses!). Incidentally, this machine would have come out with a plastic standard hose, and the user would have added the dual port, Sidekick, and hose cord. The electric hose in the picture, while it came with the Discovery Advantage, is not original to it.


Handle, which is in the original style, but clearly a replacement from the pale blue Aerus days.


Front view. The light beige or grey of the body still retains its original color, with very little fading or yellowing. Graphics and color-wise, the Discovery Advantage exactly resembles the Genesis, and in fact I'd say that the latter came out very shortly after the former.


One thing I noticed...the model number of the Discovery Advantage is 1572E, which is shared by the Discovery III, and both are rated at 8.1 amps (unless, of course, the power nozzle hood in this case was simply taken from a Discovery III). In fact, I'd say the only differences between these two models are color and logos, because the motors sound the same, and the performance is the same. There were also two other uprights with the name 'Discovery', namely the Discovery II and the Discovery Plus. I can't remember, but I THINK the Discovery Plus shared the same graphics and colors as the Discovery II, so I'm guessing the order of manufacture was: II, Plus, III, Advantage. Don't quote me on that, however. As for the matching cylinders, I have no idea...perhaps the Model 90 was one of them? There were so many machines released only for a short time by Aerus/Electrolux that its hard to keep track, not to mention the overlapping of one model line or part thereof with another. 

Another thing I noticed only recently about the III and Advantage is that you can clearly see the outline of the space where the "Discovery II" logo was on the tail of the L on the power nozzle. Clearly the company didn't manufacture brand new power nozzle covers for subsequent models.

Incidentally, this is the last acquisition I'll be making, at least for a considerable time to come. I feel that I have more than enough of a collection to enjoy and use right now, and I'm not willing to spend any more money on any more machines, nor do I have the space to store them. I have a small, disused bedroom downstairs where all of my vacuums, parts, and supplies are stored, and, all things considered, I feel the situation is at a manageable and enjoyable point. I don't want my hobby to become a burden, which is what I fear will happen with any more acquisitions. In addition, I have a fairly decent representation of cleaners from different eras of Aerus/Electrolux history, and most are in a useable state, so, unless I win the lottery, now seems a good time to stop and enjoy/use/maintain what I have.


112 Combined Years of Vintage Vacuum-ness!

$
0
0
Today, mostly for fun (and why do something that makes you sad, I say), and partly because I needed to clean, I broke out my two favorite vintage Electrolux models, the 88 2nd version and the 55 1st version, respectively.

As I've said before, for hard surface dusting and bare floors, a massive amount of suction isn't needed, and, even though these machines are not as powerful as modern Electrolux/Aerus models, they do the job just fine, with less power consumed, and with considerably less noise. These machines are really astoundingly quiet, the 88 being somewhat more so than the 55. I can only imagine how someone who is used to more modern vacuums would react after hearing one of these running. Of course, if you add on the power nozzle, it becomes moot, as Electrolux power nozzles have never really been quiet. In addition to this, I used the 55 to vacuum the 88 after filter, and the 88 to vacuum the 55 cloth bag and after filter.

Note: This particular 88 (I have three) has the "Electrolux" logo stamped on both sides of the plug, as opposed to all the other 80 series machines I have or have seen, which have the logo only on one side. Completely random? Who knows?

Incidentally, I think the 88 2nd version and the 55 1st version are positively gorgeous machines, quite close to the first Renaissance in the looks department. It's a great pity they aren't as useful as the latter, for, on the rare occasions I use a vintage Electrolux, I can't get past the short cord, lack of fingertip power controls, lack of variable speed suction, and lack of on board/lock fit attachments. Sad, but true. However, as I pointed out before, different eras mean different levels of technology and performance, so it's not completely fair to compare vacuums like this. All of my models have their pros and cons (yes, even the newer ones, which I love using!), and the 55 and 88 are fine vacuums which do exactly what they're supposed to, quietly and efficiently.

For the carpet, I used my go-to boy, the Lux 6000. What else is new?





Everything That Happens is Supposed to Happen, and it Doesn't AlwaysSuck

$
0
0
(Rather than prolong the Lux 6000 post, I decided to present this here)

Coincidence, or what may very well be the natural order of the universe, can sometimes be a fascinating thing. Within a week or so of getting the Aerus Lux 6000, minus the electric hose, Sidekick* combination dusting/upholstery tool*, and baby crevice tool*, I happened upon an auction selling an electric hose, combination dusting/upholstery tool, and after filter, all in unused condition, and all to match the Lux 6000**, for a most agreeable price. Naturally, I ordered it.

What do you think I was doing when the mail carrier came up the driveway with a small box? Vacuuming the carpet with the Lux 6000, of course! What do you think I did once I opened the box? You'd be quite wrong if you thought I did anything other than connect up the hose, find a Sidekick, and vacuum off the sofas!



Everything was quite intact, and obviously never used...there wasn't a single scratch or speck of dirt to be seen. Even better, my Aerus Lux 6000 is fully functional, as it was intended when it was released. One of these days, I'll probably happen upon an exact-matching Sidekick and baby crevice tool, and wouldn't it be great if they were included with an Electrolux Lux 4000 or the other version of the Aerus Lux 6000? I know I said that I had to stop collecting, but if I had the chance to get one or both of these, I'd be sorely tempted.

One can see the Sidekick tracks on the sofa. This Sidekick is borrowed from the white/grey/red Epic 3500.



Machine end. Exactly the same as the Style R hose end, but this only has two prongs/pins.



The Aerus Lux 6000 is really a deluxe model that stands a cut above the rest, I must say. Naturally, this goes for the other Aerus Lux 6000 and the Electrolux Lux 4000 too. I wish these had never been discontinued.



*I do happen to have numerous extras of all these attachments...it's just that, from a purist/pedantic/collector perspective, they aren't a strict white and pale blue color match for the Lux 6000.

**Further on the subject of matching, this hose and combo tool are the exact white and pale blue of the Lux 6000, but they have the "Electrolux" logo stamped on them, leading me to believe they might have come with the Electrolux Lux 4000. As far as I know, after the company changed its name to "Aerus", the attachments and hose handles have a blank space where the "Electrolux" used to be. Why can't they put "Aerus" there?

UPDATE 12-29-13: In fact, after looking at my friend's Aerus Lux Classic, I can confirm that the hose handle and attachments merely have a blank space in place of the former "Electrolux". 

Carbon Pre-filters

$
0
0
I noticed these the last time I was at my local Aerus shop...carbon post-bag or pre-motor filters, made to fit the Style C/R/U models. The new Aerus Lux Guardian Platinum comes with one of these (in a plastic holder, if I recall rightly), and I guess the company thought it a good idea to make them available for the other models. Naturally, I bought a couple of packages for my machines.

Installed in the Aerus Lux 6000:



Installed in the Renaissance:



Style R and Style U carbon pre-filters:



Since I just bought and installed these today, I'm not sure how they work practically, but I'll see how it goes and report back in the near future. Theoretically, with a Home Solutions filter bag, a carbon pre-filter, and a HEPA after filter, (and, of course, providing the motor is clean!), there should be next to no smell coming out of an Electrolux or Aerus vacuum*. Of course, the new Platinum goes one step better with the second HEPA filter.

UPDATE 08-29-13: I've been using the carbon pre-filters for a couple of weeks now, and they definitely do seem to absorb odors well. It remains to be seen how long they can do so; perhaps they're meant to be replaced at the same time as the after or HEPA filter.

UPDATE 09-05-13: I've since tried the carbon filters in a couple of machines that had fairly full (and smelly) bags as well as used after filters, and the exhaust air smelled quite clean and neutral. It seems, therefore, that these carbon pre-filters do their job.

*My experience with Electrolux and Aerus HEPA filtration has been with the Style R vacuums, so I can't speak about the models that followed, but, as I've pointed out elsewhere in this blog, the Style R HEPA filter works quite well for me. It does a good job of making the house smell cleaner, for a longer time. In addition, since I have more than one Style R machine, each one only gets used semi-regularly, and therefore the bags and filters last for a longer time. With the addition of the carbon filter, the air quality in the house will be even better.

The Innards of the Renaissance

$
0
0
The Renaissance C104A cord winder was misbehaving, rewinding the cord of its own accord, which was annoying, to say the least of it. You can hardly pull a cylinder behind you, trying to vacuum your house, while the cord is rewinding, so some investigation was necessary.

The Renaissance dismantled. It was a little dusty in there, so of course I took the opportunity to clean and disinfect it.


Underneath the white lever on the cord winder is a little wheel, which, when dirty, can possibly cause cord winder problems such as the one I was having. I simply cleaned the wheel with a q-tip, reassembled everything, and lo and behold, it solved the problem. I hope it doesn't occur again, at least for a while, but its not a huge problem to fix it again. If it continues to be problematic, I'll replace the entire cord winder.

As can be seen, the Renaissance has a single stage/fan motor. Note also the plastic box-like cover over the rest of the motor.


The Renaissance exhaust system. When this plug is pushed down, as I'm doing here, the vent is closed off and the exhaust redirects upwards (i.e. into the hose for blowing). When in normal position, the exhaust blows out through the vent, over the motor, and out through the attachment compartment. I always wondered what this configuration was like, and now I know. Presumably brothers Renaissance C104H and Epic 8000 are the same.

Incidentally, I hadn't dismantled any of my vacuums for a long time, until today. It's good to get back into the guts of things, so to speak.


Re: Question on 'Eluxography' page about Renaissance hose

$
0
0
DISCLAIMER: I take no responsibility for anything that might happen to persons or property as a result of performing repairs on any vacuum cleaner or part thereof. This information is for illustrative and informational purposes only.

That being said, here is a picture of the machine end of my Renaissance C104A hose, with the plastic covers removed, and facing upwards (i.e. The side with the release button on it). The two longer pins are on top, and the two shorter on the bottom.



The wiring connecting to the left-side pins seems to come out of the hose a little lower down than the wiring for the right pins. Also, the wiring for the bottom pins seems to be of a lighter grey than the wiring for the top pins.

I'm not sure if this answers the poster's question? In any event, this is what my hose looks like, and it works properly.


Not Mine, but Worth Showcasing

$
0
0
I did some heavy duty Christmas cleaning for an old family friend yesterday and today, and this is her vacuum: the Aerus Lux Classic.



This is virtually identical to the previous flagship base models, namely the LE and Ambassador, save for the different, more powerful, and louder motor. I used the Classic for dusting, stairs, bare floors, and baseboards. For carpet (my friend has it almost wall-to-wall), I brought along my battleship grey Epic 3500 #2. 

Here is the only (external) difference I can see between the Classic and it's predecessors: this (permanent?) post-motor filter. I don't recall seeing one of these before.



A Polished Performance

$
0
0
Since I've been using this fellow quite a bit recently for Christmas cleaning, I thought I'd showcase him in his own 'featurette'. This is my GE floor polisher, bought for next to nothing from a local seller many moons ago.




I use this machine for scrubbing and buffing linoleum (kitchen and bathroom) floors, and for buffing laminate floors. It's an old*, homely, battle-scarred machine, but it works fine, and is just the right size for my relatively small house. The seller included a plethora of brushes/pads with it...steel wool, 'SOS pad', and wool, so it has an accoutrement for all of my requirements. I've even used it before cleaning carpets, to work in cleaning solution for stubborn stains. All in all, a worthwhile purchase, and, like my Shop Vac**, an important non-Electrolux/Aerus member of the cleaning team. I suppose I could get a Floor Pro, and use it additionally for carpet cleaning, but it'd be rather bulky on my relatively small bare floor area. By the by, if Aerus made a wet/dry vacuum, I'd probably have it, but Shop Vac does the job for me.



Ratings plate. I'm not sure how to read the date code*. It could mean 'May 1965', or something else, but at any rate, I'm sure it's seen more than a few years of use.

**Speaking of the Shop Vac, it gets daily, and often twice or thrice daily use cleaning up wet, slushy, snowy, and dirty front and back porches. I even vacuum off the bottom of boots with it.

Reflections

$
0
0
Eluxurious is getting near to its second anniversary, and I have to say I've quite enjoyed every moment of administering it. I can't remember exactly when or why I wanted to create my own personal vacuum collection showcase, but it had been building up for some time, and I'm satisfied with having shared one of my favourite hobbies with the world, as it were.

I still have more than a few models in my collection that are waiting to be featured, and some of the content on this blog will no doubt be revised and/or expanded upon. I'm also sure that I'll find some new and interesting content to add. As for adding more models to my collection, I'm not sure. Right now, my financial situation doesn't permit me to do it, but I can't rule it out completely for the future. As I mentioned in my Discovery Advantage post, however, I do want to concentrate on the machines I have. I still have my Diplomat restoration waiting, for example, and I definitely want to completely disassemble one of my uprights this year (I've never worked on an upright before).

One of the biggest changes in my vacuum collecting and usage habits over the past several years has definitely been my interest in newer Electrolux and Aerus models. At one time, I was only interested in collecting and using vintage machines, but that's not so anymore. Mind you, I still do like the vintage models, and still put them to use on occasion, but I'm much more drawn to newer models these days. If I do add any more vacuums to the collection, they'll definitely be newer models. 

Speaking of newer (i.e. released in the past 20 or so years, give or take) models, my cleaning team for this holiday season was (and still is) the Lux 6000 and Lux Guardian. These are my favourites out of all my models for everyday use; the 6000 somewhat more so than the Guardian, because it's the only upright of this type that I have. 


At any rate, I look forward to another year of chronicling my hobby. Happy Electroluxing and/or Aerusing to all, and Happy New Year.

The End of an Era

$
0
0
Here is the Electrolux Z57, made in Canada as the top of the line offering by Electrolux Canada, between 1953-7, as far as I know. My particular 57 was made in 1956, and it still does the job just fine.


Speaking aesthetically, this is arguably the ugliest of the Canadian Electroluxes, but there may be other candidates as well, and it would be as well to remember that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Even something that at first glance is unattractive and homely can have a certain style and charm, and I can't forget that this is a 58 year old machine. As can be seen, the handle is in sorry shape, but still basically intact. The main body portion exactly resembles its predecessors and companion models (30, 55 in three versions, and 54), but the add-ons set the 57 apart.

The first difference is the cord winder, which was standard on the 57. This one is brown to match the machine, but I've seen them in silver as well. A plug leads from the cord winder to the machine, and the unit is permanently attached to the rear blower cover, which then screws in like all the others. This certainly enhances the usability of the 57 as compared with other models, but it definitely destroys the streamlining of the body. Also, it tends to make the machine a little heavy when picking it up. Electrolux Canada would perfect this situation when they came out with the 86 and 88 in 1957, which were completely redesigned with the cord winder integrated into the vacuum body*.

Cord winder, detached:



Cord winder, hinged open to connect the hose for blowing:



The second change is in the wheel and castor system, although the 57 still kept the metal runners. A castor was added near the front, and this became standard on all models thereafter. Actually, the U.S. models had already ditched the runners in favor of wheels/castors by this time, I believe. The rear wheels simply screw on to the runners, making the 57 considerably more maneuverable than its predecessors and lower-line companions.

Rear view, showing rear wheels screwed on to the runners:



Bottom view, with front caster, rear wheels, and ratings plate:



Close up of logo strip:



I recall a fellow collector saying that the 57 in its later years offered disposable bags, which would make it the first Canadian Electrolux to do so. I don't think they were Style C, however, as the bag chamber is a completely different shape than the Style C bag.

Plugged in and ready to clean, with updated hose. As far as I know, the 57 shared the same motor as the 30, 54, and 55. Its certainly just as quiet and powerful as those. Its also the last machine of this type before the completely redesigned 80 series came out...sort of the last of the 'old school' vacuums.



*Technically, the 80 series cord winder is only integrated into the body when it's closed and latched, for it can be opened to install an after filter, and can be detached from the machine by removing it from the rear wheel axles, but it is more part of the body than previous cord winders. 

A Special Vacuum Indeed

$
0
0
Here is my Electrolux Special Edition (Model 2100) vacuum cleaner, which I believe was made and sold between 1987-9. It's probably the nicest looking out of all the machines in the endless parade of E2000 style models...wine and grey makes for a nice combination. I got this, by the way, from a local seller whose father had owned it, and rarely used it. It was and still is in great mechanical and cosmetic condition.

The full ensemble, featuring the original hose*, power nozzle**, plastic accessory wands, combination tool, baby crevice tool, floor brush, and Sidekick. If memory serves, everything except the Sidekick came with this purchase, and I'm assuming, as this is a top-of-the-line model, that the Sidekick would have been (optionally) available with the brand new ensemble.



Other than its good looks, what makes the SE special? If I recall correctly, Electrolux sold the SE outside of the normal door-to-door or showroom network. In fact, I can remember seeing display kiosks in shopping malls featuring the SE, LE, SE upright, and SE shampooer-polisher, somewhere in the late '80's. Why Electrolux did this, I don't know...perhaps they wanted to increase their exposure, and thus sales, by changing their sales methods***. Did it work? Who knows?

Close ups of the information panel and power nozzle, with logos:





Don't quote me on this, but I believe the baby crevice tool, bumper-less floor brush, and plastic wands were standard with this model. I'm not sure if this was standard across the board on all of the special and/or economy models. As a comparison, when my folks got their brand new in-the-box Diplomat in 1990, it came with a full-sized crevice tool, floor brush with bumper, and a set of old school steel accessory wands, so perhaps there was a bit of mixing and matching going on over the years. I also note that my friend's 2009(?) or 2010(?) Aerus Lux Classic has these same 'cheaper' attachments.

All that surmised about, the 2100 Special Edition is a fine vacuum, and I do put it to work on occasion. In fact, after this post, I made it the upstairs vacuum for the week.

*Of course, I NEVER use any of the piece of shit Electrolux braided hoses. The ONLY good thing about any of them is the attractive weave patterns on them. I may be vehement about it, but those braided hoses are the only things I absolutely detest about Electrolux. 

**The PN5, PN6, and PN6a (which this one is) are unique among Electrolux power nozzles for having the "Omni-flo Automatic" (whatever that means...automatic height adjustment, I guess) logo as well as the notation "for carpets and floors". To my knowledge, Electrolux had never before included the functions of the vacuum or accessory on the vacuum or accessory itself, except for something like 'Automatic' or 'Elux-o-Matic', and I don't think they have done so since. Perhaps, since the L-shaped nozzle was a new design, the company wanted to emphasize its dual function. Who knows?

***I believe the Regency Series was also sold outside of the normal channels. Is this true of the Advantage Series as well? I'm confuzzled now.


Some Time Traveling With My Favorite Vintage Electrolux

$
0
0
I needed to clean the lint trap of my dryer today, and the first vacuum I laid eyes on happened to be the 88 1st version. I figured I'd bust out the original hose and attachments, purely for fun, and this naturally led to a little photo shoot.

Assuming this was 1961, and you owned the top-of-the-line Electrolux model for that year, this is what you would have had:


The ensemble shown would have included everything you needed for daily cleaning. The vaporizer and sprayer, while original to the machine, would not (presumably) have been used for everyday cleaning, so I didn't picture them here. One 'false' note...the original dusting brush for this model would have had a bare metal top, with a red bumper, but I don't happen to have one of those.

Fast forward a couple of years to 1963, and this would have been your top-of-the-line Electrolux cleaning ensemble:


The major difference here is the telescopic wand, vastly more user-friendly than the two-piece set. The floor and rug tools also had a spring clip added, and the handikit became smaller. The motor unit also got a rubber bumper. Everything else was the same.

Note: I do have another 88, made in 1965, and it has the plug in the handle for the power nozzle. It was more or less around this time that the power nozzles, power hose handles, and power wands started to come out. I wouldn't mind having the above to make my 88 collection more complete.

Incidentally, both of these 88s run perfectly. The hose, attachments, and wand are in perfect condition, except for the dusting brush. It would have been amazing enough to have had one or the other of these when they were released, but here I am, 53 and 51 years later, with these beautiful ensembles in my collection, still looking as handsome as ever, and still offering their cleaning services.

How Now, Brown Cow

$
0
0
When I was going to vacuum the downstairs the other day, I thought I'd break out a vintage machine and put it through its paces, not least because motors need to be run regularly to avoid seizing up and drying out. I decided to use the AP280, and now, after a couple of days of cleaning duty, he gets a feature in Eluxurious.

The Electrolux AP280 was made in Canada by Electrolux Canada, from 1980-ish - 1982. It was the first ever Electrolux (in North America, at least...not sure about other countries) to have a variable speed motor; in this case, two-speed, and this definitely makes it a standout model. It's also arguably the nicest looking of the 1970's AP Series, in elegant chocolate brown with ivory trimmings. 

Here are some shots of the AP280. First, the entire* ensemble, including the original hose, power nozzle, dusting brush, upholstery tool, crevice tool, floor brush, and attachment caddy**. 



Top view. The AP280 was the last of this type before the more recognizable E2000 came out (the design and style of which is more or less identical today, except for mechanics). That said, the design of subsequent models didn't change ALL that much. 



Logos:





Closer view of top deck with filter cover latch, motor speed selector switch, automatic bag-full shutoff dial, power available light, and no-bag/full-bag light. Note the little "Elux" logo: on the previous AP100 and AP200, this is where the no-bag/full-bag red light was.



Power available light. This comes on when the machine is plugged in, but goes off when it is switched on. Later lights simply stayed on at all times when the machine was plugged in and/or running.



No-bag/full bag light. Works exactly the same as all the other models...if you try to start the motor without a bag present, the light will come on, and when the bag is full, the motor will shut off and the red light will come on.



Inside of bag door. Note the older style connectors for the electric hose/wand/power nozzle. The serial number indicates it was made in 1982.



Another full-on shot. I used this to do the carpet, minus the dreadful original hose (although this does have the trigger switch and sliding suction vent). The power nozzle is identical to the American power nozzle of the time, which I think was the PN2, except for the logo strip. In fact, the color combo of the AP280 is identical to its American contemporary, the Olympia. 



I believe I got the AP280 with all of its accoutrements from a fellow collector, but my memory doesn't always serve me well :) It's a great vacuum, and holds its head up high even against today's models, with the additional benefits of being quieter and using less power. When I was younger, I saw quite a few of these. In fact, of the five houses on my side of the street, there were 2 AP280's (and, incidentally, an AP100!). In another case, which sufficiently illustrates how deficient my childhood memories are in terms of anything other than vacuum cleaners, I recall watching a cleaner vacuuming a hospital waiting room with an AP280, somewhere around 1983-4. I was there to visit my grandmother, but remember nothing except the AP280. 

*I believe the carpet nozzle and sprayer, along with other possible accessories, were optional by this time. 

**As can be seen on Doug Smith's site, some of these caddies were in brown as well.
Viewing all 55 articles
Browse latest View live